New IEA 4E SSL Annex Literature Review Offers Insights into Complex area of LED lifetime testing

SSL IEA report Thumbnail

June 21, 2021

A new report by the IEA 4E Solid State Lighting Annex provides a look across the body of literature on lifetime definitions for LEDs and LED products. The reports looks at failure mechanisms, accelerated life tests and test methods for estimating lifetime, and provides some recommendations. There is currently no agreement as to which test method can best estimate the lifetime of LED lighting products and the report thus addresses a key issue for regulators and industry interested in deployment of LED technologies.

Lighting plays an essential part in everyday life, enabling people to extend their working day, improve their quality of life and expand the productivity of our workforces. However, lighting accounts for approximately 15% percent of global electricity end-use, which comes with a heavy climate and environmental impact. However, while the demand for energy services continues to grow, lighting represent one of the few areas where the energy use has been reduced globally over the last decade. This is thanks to LED technologies, which is rapidly taking over as the preferred lighting technology.

LED lighting offers many advantages such as lower energy consumption, better quality light, improved optical performance and longer lifetime than conventional lighting products. And, even though many lighting test standards have been published, there isn’t agreement as to which test method can best estimate the lifetime of LED lighting products.

Today’s reportLiterature Summary of Lifetime Testing of Light Emitting Diodes and LED Products, seeks to address this issue, by survey and summarise the literature, and make some recommendations as to which approach is best. The report draws a clear distinction between the two types of LED product failure: (1) Catastrophic failure and (2) Parametric failure.

Failure Modes

Catastrophic failure represents a change in the LED lighting system that results in sudden cessation of light output from the LED system, such as a failure in a soldered joint in the driver.  Parametric failure is characterised as a gradual change over time until the LED product is no longer producing acceptable light.  This could include for example, gradual reduction in light output or a shift in the colour of the light produced.

“Lifetime testing is a critical aspect of overall product testing for LED products,” said Professor Georges Zissis, Chair of the SSL Annex’s Management Committee and representative from France. “This report was prepared for us by the experts at the Lighting Research Centre in New York, USA and it offers a high-level summary of all the recent lifetime literature and failure mechanisms, giving guidance on which approach is deemed most effective today.”

The study found that most lifetime test method standards in use presently consider only parametric failure, the light output maintenance of the LED product. However, studies have shown that lighting products in applications can fail parametrically or catastrophically, and the literature suggests that LED system lifetime depends on both the application environment and the use pattern. Taken together, these conditions cause high LED junction temperature (which degrades the components surrounding the chip and leads to parametric failure) and thermal stress at the interconnects (which results in broken connections and leads to catastrophic failure). The study concludes therefore that to accurately estimate the life of LED lighting systems, the test method and the experiment setup must have the ability to change the environmental conditions and the on-off switching pattern.

Recommended Pathways

The report concludes by recommending two potentially successful life test methods for LED lighting systems, one being the test method adopted by the European Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/2020 which establishes a long-duration switching cycle test method that combines lumen maintenance and switching cycles into one test method.  A second promising test method is one proposed by the Lighting Research Centre and formalised by the Alliance for Solid-State Illumination Systems and Technologies (ASSIST).  The LRC method has the added advantage that it can be used to predict LED system lifetime based on specified or expected environmental conditions and use patterns, although it does not consider the influence of relative humidity as an independent variable.

Go HERE to download a copy of the report.

Related Articles


Latest Articles

  • Understanding U.S. Energy Regulations and Standards: Key Updates for 2024

    Energy regulations are crucial for reducing consumption and setting mandatory requirements for new buildings and renovations. Major U.S. standards like Title 24 of California’s regulations, the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), and ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1 serve as the basis for state codes. While the IECC covers both residential and commercial buildings, ASHRAE focuses solely on… Read More…

  • Balancing Energy Efficiency and Light Pollution in Outdoor Lighting

    Overview A DesignLights Consortium (DLC) study advocates incentivizing LUNA-qualified outdoor products that reduce light pollution and save energy. These luminaires meet DLC’s standards for efficacy and quality. The study shows that using LUNA products in outdoor retrofits, like a high school parking lot and a main street in Fort Collins, Colorado, results in greater energy… Read More…